- Posts: 584
- Thank you received: 447
Connacht Clan
Official Supporters Club of Connacht Rugby

Pro14 2019/2020
- neill_m
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Pro 14:
Confirmed: Leinster, Glasgow and Munster
TBC Ulster, Connacht and Treviso.
The Play-off would have Cardiff Blues at home to Edinburgh. If the Pro 14 get the 20th Heineken spot, then Cardiff Blues would be in automatically with an Edinburgh Ospreys playoff.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- connachta
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3011
- Thank you received: 987
salmson wrote:
pinky wrote: Treviso's RDS heroics open up a chance for Munster to get ahead of Leinster too, though that's less likely. You wouldn't know though with Leinster having nothing really to play for in the last couple of games.
Whatever way, Conf B looks more desirable, with Dragons, Kings and Edinburgh guaranteed.
Right so Pinky, outsides ourselves this week I'm cheering for:
Edinburgh, so we finish ahead of Ulster and get a nicer conference next year.
Kings, so we're guaranteed at least a playoff.
Treviso, so Munster have nothing to play for against us.
Glasgow, ditto.
Zebre, to remove Scarlets from the playoff equation.
Scarlets are not on the play-off équation anymore (at home). And i will cheer for Ulster even if bad for next season it'd be a guarantee : home play-off vs edinburgh even if we lose, less pressure to play Cardiff
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- salmson
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2945
- Thank you received: 1670
pinky wrote: Treviso's RDS heroics open up a chance for Munster to get ahead of Leinster too, though that's less likely. You wouldn't know though with Leinster having nothing really to play for in the last couple of games.
Whatever way, Conf B looks more desirable, with Dragons, Kings and Edinburgh guaranteed.
Right so Pinky, outsides ourselves this week I'm cheering for:
Edinburgh, so we finish ahead of Ulster and get a nicer conference next year.
Kings, so we're guaranteed at least a playoff.
Treviso, so Munster have nothing to play for against us.
Glasgow, ditto.
Zebre, to remove Scarlets from the playoff equation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pinky
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
Whatever way, Conf B looks more desirable, with Dragons, Kings and Edinburgh guaranteed.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neill_m
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 584
- Thank you received: 447
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neill_m
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 584
- Thank you received: 447
pinky wrote:
neill_m wrote: Excellent point, also only doing it on the basis of the current season with the imbalance of the number of home and away games. Why not over last and this season - 21 home and 21 away games for each side?
Yeah, and while I'm at it, how come they do it based on overall points regardless of conference position? So they're applying different criteria do determine seedings for next season than they apply to determine playoff positions in the league.
True. Using points to determine the conference line up, but finishing position etc to determine which pot sides would be in for European draws. It's almost like they came up with the idea on a beer mat.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- connachta
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3011
- Thank you received: 987
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neill_m
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 584
- Thank you received: 447
neill_m wrote:
pinky wrote: Interesting. Wales Online claiming it is a "radical re-jig", though really they are just doing what they said they would do this season but decided not to.
www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-...hauled-next-16077439
If true, there would appear to appear to be an incentive to get ahead of Ulster as Conference B looks the easier prospect, especially if Treviso don't keep up the form they found this season.
EDIT: A bit odd they are saying it will be based on the regular season, so you could win the Pro14 and not be the top ranked side from your country ...
Excellent point, also only doing it on the basis of the current season with the imbalance of the number of home and away games. Why not over last and this season - 21 home and 21 away games for each side?
Interestingly, I did have an analysis going on the Conference rejig on the 2 season model over the regular season - only difference is that Scarlets would stay in Conference B as top Welsh side and Cardiff Blues would stay in A as Wales 2.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pinky
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
neill_m wrote: Excellent point, also only doing it on the basis of the current season with the imbalance of the number of home and away games. Why not over last and this season - 21 home and 21 away games for each side?
Yeah, and while I'm at it, how come they do it based on overall points regardless of conference position? So they're applying different criteria do determine seedings for next season than they apply to determine playoff positions in the league.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neill_m
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 584
- Thank you received: 447
pinky wrote: Interesting. Wales Online claiming it is a "radical re-jig", though really they are just doing what they said they would do this season but decided not to.
www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-...hauled-next-16077439
If true, there would appear to appear to be an incentive to get ahead of Ulster as Conference B looks the easier prospect, especially if Treviso don't keep up the form they found this season.
EDIT: A bit odd they are saying it will be based on the regular season, so you could win the Pro14 and not be the top ranked side from your country ...
Excellent point, also only doing it on the basis of the current season with the imbalance of the number of home and away games. Why not over last and this season - 21 home and 21 away games for each side?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Betty Swallocks
-
- Offline
- Elite Member
-
- Posts: 288
- Thank you received: 196
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pinky
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-...hauled-next-16077439
If true, there would appear to appear to be an incentive to get ahead of Ulster as Conference B looks the easier prospect, especially if Treviso don't keep up the form they found this season.
EDIT: A bit odd they are saying it will be based on the regular season, so you could win the Pro14 and not be the top ranked side from your country ...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neill_m
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 584
- Thank you received: 447
cabaiste wrote: Not much variation there with just Leinster & Scarlets moving over.
Ulster and Connacht very close points wise.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- cabaiste
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 59
- Thank you received: 57
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- neill_m
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 584
- Thank you received: 447
Conference A Ireland 1 & 4 (Leinster + Connacht), Wales 2 & 3 (Scarlets + Ospreys), Scotland 1 (Glasgow), Italy 2 (Zebre), South Africa 1 (Cheetahs)
Conference B Ireland 2 & 3 (Munster + Ulster), Wales 1 & 4 (Cardiff Blues + Dragons), Scotland 2 (Edinburgh), Italy 1 (Benetton), South Africa 2 (Southern Kings)
Based on the 1st 18 rounds.
Re-rank based on points gained in the 21 games in the regular season for the 18/19 season.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- connachta
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3011
- Thank you received: 987
We should miss Bealham, they will miss Navidi
www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/rugby/rugby-...am-star-out-16045470
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.