Connacht Clan

Official Supporters Club of Connacht Rugby

Connacht Clan BLACK MURTY RABBITTS

Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

More
9 years 11 months ago #43532 by pinky
Replied by pinky on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
Yep, only a bonus point win was any real use to us.
A win wouldn't have been much better to us than an LBP. Only difference is we now can't draw on Saturday.
There have been 64 LBPs in the league so far and only 1 draw, so the benefit of getting the fourth try far outweighed the risk of losing. The decision to attack on the last play rather than kick the ball out was more than justified.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Shelflife

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43512 by cormac
Replied by cormac on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

Decadence wrote: Still reeling from this result despite the long weekend, we were a yard away from having a guaranteed home semi final, avoiding a rematch with Glasgow and a free shot at finishing top of the table. Even just the win would have meant a losing bonus on Saturday would have guaranteed a home semi. We already missed a golden opportunity for a home semi against Grenoble, we need to get the job done on Saturday.


Not quite.
A win would have put us on 72, losing bonus against Glasgow at 73.
Glasgow would finish on 75 or 76 with a win against us.
Leinster BPW at home to Treviso next sat would put them on 73 and ahead of us on boht points difference and games won.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Decadence, green13

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Decadence
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
9 years 11 months ago #43511 by Decadence
Replied by Decadence on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
Still reeling from this result despite the long weekend, we were a yard away from having a guaranteed home semi final, avoiding a rematch with Glasgow and a free shot at finishing top of the table. Even just the win would have meant a losing bonus on Saturday would have guaranteed a home semi. We already missed a golden opportunity for a home semi against Grenoble, we need to get the job done on Saturday.

"Our march is quite slow y'know, when we get to where we want to get to, it's going to take time, but when we get there it's going to be fantastic." - Johnny O'Connor 2013

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43466 by connachta
Replied by connachta on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
Psycho work to do too. Leinster scrum is scary. But Glasgow isn't reputed for that area. Not like we'll be facing the best scrum in europe. Treviso has a good one, and it was Finlay's first apperence as LH since the Ireland cameo. With White we should handle it

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43465 by FACECUTTR
Replied by FACECUTTR on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
I think it has to be Finlay. He needs to be on the field. Hopefully Nathan is back or we are doomed with Rodney. Glasgow, Leinster, Ulster and Scarlets/Munster will be targeting us in the set piece come semi finals.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • dobby
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
9 years 11 months ago #43462 by dobby
Replied by dobby on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
Lads, ease up. It was a huge disappointment to us all. No need for the niggles. As teams go that was the worst team we put out this season. So we got a right kick in the knuts. It does not take away from our season. And that's where its at. We have had the best season on record. The only people to blame for that are our team. Because they are feckin great and a joy to watch

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • menacethedenis
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
9 years 11 months ago #43461 by menacethedenis
Replied by menacethedenis on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

eezipc wrote:

menacethedenis wrote:

eezipc wrote:

menacethedenis wrote: Oh and fitzgibbon is the worst ref in the league. He is utterly incompetent, come back Leighton all is forgiven

Again idiotic.
FitzGibbon is not the reason Connacht lost that game.


I never said he was, genius

Stay classy.


Great contribution. Stay on boards.ie if you're only here to call people idiotic.

“I wanna f#*kin' win, I wanna f#*kin' win..............BADLY”

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43460 by eezipc
Replied by eezipc on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

menacethedenis wrote:

eezipc wrote:

menacethedenis wrote: Oh and fitzgibbon is the worst ref in the league. He is utterly incompetent, come back Leighton all is forgiven

Again idiotic.
FitzGibbon is not the reason Connacht lost that game.


I never said he was, genius

Stay classy.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43458 by connachta
Replied by connachta on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
Would try Finlay as LH again, just needed time to switch from TH, could be better next week.... Add Dillane Muldowney and Muldoon pushing behind, and it could be a more cohesive unit. But all depends on Nathan recovery...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • dobby
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
9 years 11 months ago #43455 by dobby
Replied by dobby on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

FACECUTTR wrote: I agree. Really thought he would have improved but he hasn't. We need the academy guys stepping up and or the likes of Bent coming in.


Problem is who do we line out in the front row. Every other position is nailed down (do hope McGinty starts) but who will our front 3 be next week. God but Connacht really suffer with the loss of Denis. Hear tom has played at loose head. Could possibly be tom, Shane and Finlay? Its a huge headache.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • dobby
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
9 years 11 months ago #43451 by dobby
Replied by dobby on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
Pat has talked all season about a process. And I don't disagree with what he says. However that process requires a significant amount of skill over simple physical prowess. On that count the team that was fielded yesterday simply didn't have the skill levels to execute the process. And I think that was the biggest failing last night.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43449 by Borders no.2
Replied by Borders no.2 on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

connachta wrote: This team doesn't kick enough, a strategy of running the baall doesn't mean we have to do it all the time. One clearance only by McGinty yesterday, straight to touch from outside the 22. Lam has 5 days to work and insist on that + the scrum without Buckley

but what I wanna say is : the win even with TBP wasn't that important

1) a Lbp next week wouldn't have been enough if the Leinster strong selection is able to get LBP in Ravenhill
2) a Lbp is not an easy thing to control against Glasgow, and we're not build for that
3) a Lbp is a defeat, just 1 week before the similar game against the same team, it's not all good for confidence
4) we're officially in the semi-final and didn't see any severe injuries after treviso
5) that's why I'm rather ok with the "win or die" situation, especially because with Aki Marmion Dillane Muldowney Muldoon etc back, it's a completely different team, and I claim we'll be favorite against Glasgow if White is back (White is White , Dillane is Dillane :P )


Ya look yesterday was a massive disappointment and I was livid at the time that we threw away 3 points at the end in search of 1. That might have been an option if we were 20 or 30 yards further up the pitch but we put ourselves in the only position that we could lose that game (i.e. leading by less than 3 and a scrum to Treviso with the final play). However, while 5 may have given us a chance of finishing above Leinster, 4 wouldn't really. To me once the dust settled to me yesterday wasn't overly important unless we drew next week. We needed to beat Glasgow anyway.

This was the game to take a bit of a risk with selection and the team that was there should have been good enough but regardless of what team is out there, its been a recurring problem all season that we have these brainfarts of 10-15 minutes after building a lead.

We created more than enough chances in the 2nd half to kill it off and a bit like the Brive game, it was one of those nights where we seemed to butcher everything.

We need to improve massively to compete against a Glasgow side slap bang in form at the moment but despite the disappointment we still secured Top 4 last night which for a long time I never thought I'd see us achieve. Last night shows another example of how we still have a distance to travel and of how important it is that Bundee and Dennis Buckley are available for the run in.

On a side note the TG4 player was a joke last night. Fair play to them for picking up the games but if they are showing them, it has to be more professional than that.
The following user(s) said Thank You: phatguerilla

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43447 by FACECUTTR
Replied by FACECUTTR on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
I agree. Really thought he would have improved but he hasn't. We need the academy guys stepping up and or the likes of Bent coming in.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • phatguerilla
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
  • phatguerilla.wordpress.com
More
9 years 11 months ago #43446 by phatguerilla
Replied by phatguerilla on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

Darragh wrote: How did Rodney play?

I assume no better than the previous muck?


Admittedly didn't see the first half hour but thought he was poor in the time I did see of him. Having said that Loughney was hooked first for Bealham and the scrum never seemed close to parity for the majority of the match, even after the subs came on.

I think Loughney's really gone backwards in the last couple of years, would have thought that he could potentially have been exactly the sort of player Lam would have liked but he has regressed, don't think he will get kept on after this contract if something doesn't change.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Darragh

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43444 by salmson
Replied by salmson on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30

Darragh wrote: How did Rodney play?

I assume no better than the previous muck?


Rodney did ok, scrum issue was mainly on the other side, he made his carries and tackles and there were no brain fart penalties.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Sol_ie, Darragh

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
9 years 11 months ago #43442 by Darragh
Replied by Darragh on topic Treviso v Connacht, April 29th 7.30
How did Rodney play?

I assume no better than the previous muck?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.