- Posts: 26
- Thank you received: 23
Connacht Clan
Official Supporters Club of Connacht Rugby

Connacht vs Glasgow Sat Sept 2nd - Match Thread
- thehoneybadger
-
- Offline
- Junior Member
-
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- menacethedenis
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1085
- Thank you received: 648
“I wanna f#*kin' win, I wanna f#*kin' win..............BADLY”
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- AJ6000
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 68
- Thank you received: 59
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- salmson
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2945
- Thank you received: 1670
Bazzo wrote: Was at EP at the weekend so didn't catch the match but I notice a few people are saying we needed a forward to get over the gainline with carries. Was Dillane completely off the pace?
The two tries came from scrums where our wingers dropped the ball, so it wasn't the losing of the game. But as to winning it, some of our players carried very high. Mul and especially Dillane were probably the most to blame in that regard. Ultan almost cantered into contact a few times he was so upright and got smashed.
I didn't think Glasgow displayed awesome carrying power (Bucks asides their pack was the same size or smaller man for man), they were just smart. A lot of the time they were going to ground almost before the tackle and sliding over the gainline. The handful of our lads who carried like this saw some success (Tom and Cannon for example, but it was swings and roundabouts when it came to the lineout). The other thing they did well was two man carries where one man latched onto the other and made damn sure they got over the gainline. Last quarter we got on top carrying-wise, SOB and Farrell did very well when they came on.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bazzo
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 527
- Thank you received: 386
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- clanman
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 787
- Thank you received: 197
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ConamaraOB
-
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 75
- Thank you received: 15
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- menacethedenis
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1085
- Thank you received: 648
“I wanna f#*kin' win, I wanna f#*kin' win..............BADLY”
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- salmson
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2945
- Thank you received: 1670
menacethedenis wrote: I wasn't surprised he tapped it with the way the lineout had been going all night
Point taken, but scrum was an option too...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- menacethedenis
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1085
- Thank you received: 648
“I wanna f#*kin' win, I wanna f#*kin' win..............BADLY”
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- salmson
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 2945
- Thank you received: 1670
RonanL wrote: Despite all the shortcomings people have listed above, we were still in with a shout towards the end. Was anyone else frustrated by Mul's decision to tap and go when we were awarded a penalty well inside their half towards the end? Surely a kick to the corner was the way to go there.
I appreciate that it was a weakened Glasgow side, but it's one more match point than we got last year from the fixture and I'm remaining positive for the season as a whole. There's no way KK would have been using his first couple of weeks to focus on monsoon tactics - let's wait and see how they perform in better conditions.
1) The tap 'n go was dumb as a bag of hammers, where I was we were groaning before it left his boot.
2) KK was clearly completely unprepared for how bad the Sportsground weather can be* - if you check the match gallery on the Connacht site you'll see he's wearing WHITE JEANS!!!!
*Joking asides, Galway is much wetter than Dublin, which in turn has weather slightly worse than Dunedin, whose climate was deemed poor enough to warrant an indoor stadium. Land of the Long White Cloud my arse!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RonanL
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 866
- Thank you received: 422
I appreciate that it was a weakened Glasgow side, but it's one more match point than we got last year from the fixture and I'm remaining positive for the season as a whole. There's no way KK would have been using his first couple of weeks to focus on monsoon tactics - let's wait and see how they perform in better conditions.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- menacethedenis
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 1085
- Thank you received: 648
“I wanna f#*kin' win, I wanna f#*kin' win..............BADLY”
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Accidentally Onside
-
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 450
- Thank you received: 299
Couldn't kick the corners as we couldn't even secure our own ball at lineout, forget about challenging theirs
So little faith in our backup LHs that Buckley played the whole game despite no preseason time
Not one of our back three had a good game, none of them were able to catch or hold onto the ball
No ball carriers in the pack, Glasgow were making easy yards every time they carried, we were being driven back. I'm a huge Masterson fan but he was anonymous.
Scrum was weak, that's a poor Glasgow scrum but they rarely looked in trouble against us
There were some positives:
SOB looked very good when he came on.
Butler was impressive, very industrious and gets through a mountain of work
Defense looked structured but not aggressive enough. Glasgow won 80%+ of the contacts
We've need ball carriers for a couple of years now, without someone that can batter you over the line your counting on good play to get you there and when the conditions are as bad as they were Saturday you're going to struggle.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Sol_ie
-
- Offline
- Administrator
-
- Posts: 2920
- Thank you received: 1909
Very hard to get an accurate read on where the players are due to the conditions. Rain was sideways, very blustery throughout.
Roll on next week. I think Kings are going to try and bounce back after their, um, less than stellar debut.
Committee Member
Treasurer
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- connachta
-
Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
-
- Posts: 3011
- Thank you received: 987
1) we can't catch a single high ball and most lineouts, Glasgow did. No excuse, TOH/Browne were missing for these
2) I don't identify the all-international front-row which was so dominant 2 years ago. And Glasgow scrum isn't the best we'll face...
3) what happened to the ball-carrying skill of Aki, Dillane, Buckley?
4) IIRC we broke their line once (Kelleher with the right option to kick but execution was straight into touch). Glasgow did 4/5 times. Can't blame the conditions for the gap
a few positive notes :
1) we could have undeservely win but also could have lost our BP...
2) handling was not worse than Glasgow's one (except high-balls/lineouts), in open-play
3) the bench looked decent indeed (Farrell, Ron, SOB)
4) Carty/Griffin are not the one to blame IMO, and happy surprise to see Butler jumping and giving extra-option in the lineout (Fox/Heenan didn't)
BTW, owe you an apologie, SOB came into the back-row (mistake IMO as Dillane looked out-of-breath, but still you were right)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.